AI-native university compliance
We automate compliance reports for universities. Gather crucial evidence across faculty and programs in one central location, and navigate institutional reviews for accrediting bodies like SACSCOC, AACSB, and ABET.
Ten people to three minutes.·A report cycle that used to take a team.·Rollins College
Built for the standards you already report against
Traceable. Auditable. Yours.
Traceable
Every claim in the report points back to the file, the date, and the person who supplied it.
Learn more
Auditable
Artifacts are mapped to the standard they answer, so gaps surface months before the site visit.
Learn more
Yours
Your evidence stays in your institution's control, and leaves in the same shape it arrived.
Learn moreOne workspace for the whole cycle
Documents, standards, drafts, and sign-offs in one place. Accreed holds the cycle together so your committee is not holding it in email.
Each section shows the standard it answers, the evidence behind it, and who owes the next revision.
Faculty Sufficiency
Headcount and qualification ratios recalculated as CVs land
Assurance of Learning
Rubric results rolled up by program and learning goal
Curriculum Review
Syllabi checked against the current catalog of record
Financial Strategy
Budget narrative pulled from the last three fiscal years
Every review has its own vocabulary
AACSB
Faculty sufficiency and qualification tables built from live CV data.
SACSCOC
Reaffirmation narratives tied to the compliance certification standard by standard.
ABET
Student outcome evidence collected per course, per term, per program.
CAEP
Clinical partnership and candidate performance records held in one file.
HLC
Assurance argument sections drafted against the criteria you are cited on.
ACEN
Program outcome tracking with the systematic plan of evaluation attached.
Our engine. Your standards.
Where is the most recent syllabus for FIN 4310?
Fall 2026 syllabus, uploaded 11 days ago by M. Delgado. Two earlier versions kept.
One versioned home for everything the review will ask you to produce.
- CVs, syllabi, rubrics, and publications filed against the faculty who own them
- Every upload keeps its date, uploader, and prior versions
- Duplicate and stale files flagged before they reach a reviewer
Artifacts tied to the standard they answer, so gaps are visible early.
- Each standard shows its evidence, its owner, and what is still missing
- Coverage recalculated the moment a new artifact lands
- Cross-references kept when a single document answers several criteria
Qualification status calculated from the record, not from memory.
- Degrees, appointments, and scholarly output read straight from the vault
- Sufficiency and qualification ratios recomputed per program
- Every classification shows the evidence it was based on
Section drafts assembled from your own evidence, with the citations attached.
- Drafts cite the artifact and date behind every claim
- Placeholders left visible wherever the evidence is thin
- Committee comments resolved in place, then the section locks
Faculty submit once. Everything else is reuse.
No shared drives, no version guessing, no fourth reminder. Faculty see exactly what is outstanding and how long it will take.
Accreed pre-fills what it can already verify, so most items close in a single click.
Current CV
Last uploaded Aug 2024, refresh for the review window
Fall syllabi
3 of 4 courses received
Peer-reviewed output
Pulled from your ORCID record, confirm the list
Signature rubric
Attach the rubric used for the capstone assessment
What it looks like on a real cycle
Rollins College
A compliance report that used to occupy ten staff now completes in about three minutes, with the evidence behind every claim attached.
Reported by Rollins College · 2026 review cycle